Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The sixth in GE1 is a clear example of a Terzverschreibung error, corrected by Chopin in FE (→EE). The correct version was introduced also in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent over the trill in A is clearly shorter than long accents at the beginning and end of this bar. However, long accents in the next bars already do not contrast so expressly with the discussed sign, hence we consider its interpretation as a long accent to be most likely. The missing accent in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly an oversight. The sign was added in GE2 (as a short accent). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It is hard to understand what the rationale of the engraver of GE1 was when he was drawing slurs so dissimilar to the notation of A. It may be that the slur beginning over the trill in bar 31 was added in the last stage of proofreading as an ad hoc, simplified correction: it is absent in FE (→EE1; in later EE the slur was added). This time, GE2 did not restore the slurs of A; it only removed the slur above the sextuplet. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing fingering digit in the editions is most probably a result of an oversight or misunderstanding concerning the essence of the dash over the grace note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
-d
