Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 30-31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The musical sense obliges us to consider three accents at the beginning of subsequent halves of bars in A to be signs of one type. Since the first and third are undoubtedly long, we interpret the third, smaller sign, to be also long (cf. short accents in bars 32-33). In the editions all three signs were reproduced as short. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of the accent in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly a mistake. The reviser of GE2 restored the sign (in the form of a short accent). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The sign of an accent in GE1 is doubly inaccurate: short and placed after the chord it concerns in the very legible notation of A. Overlooked in FE (→EE), it was moved to the right place in GE2 (without changes in shape). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent in A is only slightly longer than the adjacent ones, hence it is not entirely certain whether Chopin meant a long accent here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent in A is clearly bigger than the adjacent ones, hence we give it in the main text as long. The short accent in the editions is most probably a typical inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »