Issues : Inaccuracies in A
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
None of the editions added the naturals returning f3 and f2 that Chopin overlooked in A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the sources there is no returning a2, which is a patent inaccuracy. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The sign written in A has uneven arms. We assume (also in the main text) that the intentional range of the sign is marked by the upper arm, more specifically by its initial fragment, separated from the main part of the sign as a result of a break in the ink supply. The editions may have taken into account the lower arm, yet the sign in GE (→FE→EE) is even longer, which certainly does not result from the notation of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
This time (cf. bar 10) the flat overlooked by Chopin in A was added already in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent in A is only slightly longer than the adjacent ones, hence it is not entirely certain whether Chopin meant a long accent here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in A |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »