Pitch
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
An additional c1 note on the 5th quaver is certainly a mistake. The correct text in subsequent EE is a result of a comparison with analogous bars 27 and 76 or GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A (→GE1→FE) there is no lowering f to f. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected in EE and GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A, the original accompaniment on the 4th beat, crossed out but lisible, was like the figure on 3rd beat, shifted a second higher. See also note to bar 13. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of the a1 note seems to be a result of Chopin's proofreading, who could have removed it to avoid false relation with the A-a octave on the 4th beat of the bar (in analogous bar 88, in which a remained in the chord, the ending chord is different). However, the version of A (→GE) may be certainly considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of GE1 is certainly erroneous: it is most probably a revised Terzverschreibung error, by adding a . Chopin restored the chord with c2, written in A, in a proofreading of FE (→EE). At the time of executing this proofreading, a superfluous was moved together with the note head. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |