Issues : Annotations in FED
b. 113-114
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The not too legible entry in FED is most probably a dynamic marking with a determined range of validity. According to us, it is probably cresc., yet dim. also seems to be possible. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A a before the bottom note of the octave in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar is missing, as well as before the 3rd semiquaver in the R.H. in the 2nd half of the bar (d1). In turn, Chopin repeated a before B, the 2nd semiquaver in the L.H. In GE1 (→FE) only the missing before the octave was added, while in EE and GE2 – both necessary naturals. Moreover, EE3 added a cautionary before b in the L.H. in the 3rd group of semiquavers; the sign was also added in FED. In the main text we add two necessary naturals and we remove the superfluous sign before the 2nd semiquaver in the L.H. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Fingering written with Chopin's hand. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering added in FED corresponds to Chopin indications given in an analogous situation in the next bar already in A (→GE→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 118
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |