![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 316-317
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the slur emphasising the A category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 318
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the last of the three-quaver slurs in the L.H. is almost certainly Chopin's oversight. The slur was added in GE1 (→FE→EE), by embracing the entire 2nd half of the bar with it. According to us, the addition can come from Chopin; however, it was most probably misinterpreted by the engraver. In GE2 the slur was shortened after previous figures, which we give in the main text as probably corresponding to Chopin's intention. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The first note in the top voice in A (→GE1→FE→EE) is an erroneous double dotted quaver. Moreover, the assignment of the middle note in the 1st chord is unclear; e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 322-324
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Three flats before g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 325-327
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A bar 325 is the last one on the page. The slur in the L.H. clearly suggests a continuation (similarly as the slur in the R.H.), which, however, is absent on a new page (in bar 326). In GE1 (→FE→EE) the slur was completely overlooked, whereas in GE2 the slur of A together with the overlooked ending was restored. Since this is how Chopin's intention undoubtedly looked like, in this case in the main text we include the slur of GE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions |