Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE is almost certainly erroneous: the engraver of GE1 generalised the pattern of the previous bars, in which the chords are unchanged. The version is contrary both to A and Morch, in which in the oboe and 2nd violin parts there is c2 after the preceding it d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing grace note is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). We suggest completing the bass line also in the middle of the bar, although the missing bass note of the chord there is significantly less noticeable (in the solo part, Chopin wrote octaves in analogous bars 134 and 282). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 50-70
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE the entire first Tutti was printed – certainly erroneously – in a font of a normal size. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dot is a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). In such a context, the sign refers also to the L.H., which we include in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot on the last crotchet is certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The error was not repeated in any of the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
-c-e-g in 
