Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dot over the bass E category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It is unclear which type of accent Chopin meant here. The sign is shorter from all previous ones on this page of A (bars 289-290); however, its shape is characteristic of long accents – cf. the accent in bar 293. GE (→FE) has a short accent, which in EE was changed to a vertical sign. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the part of the R.H. A (→GE1→FE) has only one category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 297
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the omission of the chord of strings (together with the following rest) written in A may be considered a mistake – as a result of corrections, Chopin moved the notation of the solo part to an adjacent stave, which could have misled the engraver. It is difficult to say why these elements were omitted also in GE2. In this place FE has an erroneous G crotchet (and a rest). It can be a misunderstood proofreading of Chopin, hence we adopt the F crotchet, being harmonically correct, as the text of FE. However, it is highly likely that it was the beginning of the next bar that was printed here. EE omitted the erroneous notation of FE. Contrary to other minor replicas from the orchestral part of this type, the discussed chord, same as the crotchets in the next bar, are only an illustration of the harmonic sequence of the orchestral accompaniment and they are certainly not to be performed, even in the solo performance. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 299-300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the font of the accents in the R.H. in bars 299-300 is an example of a characteristic discretion of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
is certainly a result of an oversight of the engraver of 
, before the 2nd semiquaver. The necessary signs for the b2 and b3 notes were added in the remaining editions.
