data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato sign is certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). In GE2, in spite of the clear wedge in A, a dot was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It is unclear which type of accent Chopin meant here. The sign is shorter from all previous ones on this page of A (bars 289-290); however, its shape is characteristic of long accents – cf. the accent in bar 293. GE (→FE) has a short accent, which in EE was changed to a vertical sign. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the clear slur of A is a typical example of the manner of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). In the main text we omit the additional slur over the quintuplet written in A – General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |