Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 291

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Wedge in A

No mark in GE1 (→FEEE)

Dot in GE2

..

The missing staccato sign is certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FEEE). In GE2, in spite of the clear wedge in A, a dot was added.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 291

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before e.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 291

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Probable long accent in A

Possible short accent in A (→GEFE)

Vertical accent in EE

..

It is unclear which type of accent Chopin meant here. The sign is shorter from all previous ones on this page of A (bars 289-290); however, its shape is characteristic of long accents – cf. the accent in bar 293. GE (→FE) has a short accent, which in EE was changed to a vertical sign.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions

b. 292

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

2 slurs in A

3 slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

Slur in GE2

..

The division of the clear slur of A is a typical example of the manner of the engraver of GE1 (→FEEE). In the main text we omit the additional slur over the quintuplet written in A – General Editorial Principlesp. 16. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 293

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before e3.

category imprint: Editorial revisions