Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
|
b. 149-150
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Similarly as in the previous bars, GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) lack seven accidentals before the notes which were previously already correctly written in another octave. These patent inaccuracies do not impede the interpretation and they were completed in the subsequent sources to a varied extent (including FED, in which a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 151-152
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of each of these bars, GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) have no naturals. The necessary signs – before a1 and a – were added in GE, FE4 and EE (in EE1 only in bar 152). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is unclear which slur Chopin meant, since the absence of a slur in FE (→EE1) does not allow us to confront the version of GC with another source modelled after [A]. According to us, the slur of GC may be inaccurate, hence we adopt the more natural version of GE. The slur of EE2, probably modelled after GE, was, however, led from g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the top note of the 2nd quaver in GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3). The patent inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining sources. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 157-160
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In both sources based on [A] – GC and FE – the pedalling is written certainly (GC) or probably (FE) inaccurately. What is more, in each of the sources the notation is different, which impedes finding out what Chopin's intention concerning this issue was (it is possible that the notation of [A] was inaccurate or unclear, e.g., as a result of corrections). In the main text we give the version of EE, which can be a result of the Chopinesque proofreading of the base text to this edition and which is analogous to the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of an identical phrase in bars 153-156. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
before the top note of the 3rd crotchet in bar 150 was added). It is only 
1 in 
