b. 110
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC does not have a quaver flag here, which is most probably an error of the copyist. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) do not have the naturals raising G1-G to G1-G. The patent mistake was corrected in EE, GE and FE4. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 112-114
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC the second quaver in the R.H. is written too low in all of these bars, so it could be interpreted as an F or F. The respective notes in the L.H. allow to guess the correct text, although in bar 113, the note in the L.H. is also written incorrectly as an A1. The remaining sources – including GE, based on GC – feature the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 113-115
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
No hairpin is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1, unnoticed in GE2 as well. In the main text we give the range of the sign according to GC, in which it starts from the beginning of the motif. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |