Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
As in bar 28, in the main text we give the notation in GC (→GE) which raises no reservations. The lack of accents in FE is certainly a mistake, and the mark in EE – most probably a long accent – a complement likely by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
As in bar 31, in the main text we suggest an accent in line with the analogous bar 11. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 234-237
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we suggest a version based on additions introduced most probably by Chopin in the base text to EE1. We adopt the placement and type of the used accents, which in EE could have been recreated inaccurately, from the undoubtedly authentic notation of the previous version of GC (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 239-241
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the staccato dot over the 2nd crotchet in bar 239 in EE may be linked to the addition of slurs, however, according to us, the authenticity of the dot's omission is not certain – the engraver of EE could have overlooked it or considered it to be superfluous with relation to the added slur. Due to the fact that the added slurs are of a phrasing character in this texture (and not articulation), in the main text we suggest dots in both analogous bars 239 and 241. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 257-258
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
in 
