Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 57-75
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-38
p. 3, b. 39-56
p. 4, b. 57-75
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Afin - Autograph fragment of Finale
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Afin - Autograph fragment of Finale
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 66

In GC, both the 5th and 9th quaver in the L.H. are written as a G. It also influences the sound of the 7th quaver, which is then to be interpreted as a G. The mistakes were not in GE, in spite of the fact that guessing the correct text of each of the hands requires a more careful analysis.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, Errors of GC

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FES, FED, Afin