![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Placement of markings , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 98-108
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 33-44 (in the autographs the discussed bars are their literal repetition), we reproduce the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||
b. 103-104
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 109-128
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 45-48, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||
b. 133-134
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The lack of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »