Pedalling
b. 33-64
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
There is no pedalling both in As and in AI. Its precise reproduction on the basis of A did not cause major problems to the editors (except for bars 49 and 61-62, which we discuss separately). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEC,EEW1) there are no pedalling indications in this bar, which is almost certainly an oversight. The signs were added in later editions on the basis of a patent analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
One can ponder whether the difference in pedalling between bars 45-46 and 61-62 was intended (deliberate) by Chopin and whether it is not a mere difference in the notation, as it sometimes happen in similar contexts. A clear differentiation of performance indications between bars 33-48 and 49-64 (other dynamics and slurring) demonstrates that it is an intentional difference, indicating varied approach to the pedalling in these pairs of bars. The revisers of later GE and EE had a different opinion, as they changed the pedalling of bars 61-62 after bars 45-46. Similarly in bars 125-126 and 189-190. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 65-93
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The pedalling is only in the version prepared for print – As and AI have no indications. In the main text, we reproduce the notation of A. In the editions, the signs were placed inaccurately in many situations, e.g., in bars 66, 70 and analog. after the 3rd crotchet or under it instead before. Other, more significant differences are discussed separately – cf. bars 72, 73, 75-76, 85-86 and 88-89. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of pedalling in GE is undoubtedly a mistake, however, it could have been committed still in FE, in which the indications were then added in the last phase of proofreadings. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |