Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 29, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEC,EEW1) there are no pedalling indications in this bar, which is almost certainly an oversight. The signs were added in later editions on the basis of a patent analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
One can ponder whether the difference in pedalling between bars 45-46 and 61-62 was intended (deliberate) by Chopin and whether it is not a mere difference in the notation, as it sometimes happen in similar contexts. A clear differentiation of performance indications between bars 33-48 and 49-64 (other dynamics and slurring) demonstrates that it is an intentional difference, indicating varied approach to the pedalling in these pairs of bars. The revisers of later GE and EE had a different opinion, as they changed the pedalling of bars 61-62 after bars 45-46. Similarly in bars 125-126 and 189-190. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 64-65
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Chopin added the suggestion to change the tempo – like all other performance marks – in A. Visible crossings-out indicate a change of the original idea; however, on the available photograph, one cannot see what was removed. In the main text, we place the indication in bar 65, in accordance with the notation of A (→FE→GE1no2). Nevertheless, it is highly likely that such a placement was forced by the layout of A – the end of bar 64 is squeezed at the end of the line, whereas on the above staff, there is the final version (f1) of the third beat of the bar, hence writing even a fragment of an indication in that place was impossible. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that moving the beginning of the indication over the 3rd beat of bar 64, introduced in the majority of editions, complies with the composer's intention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 68-69
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In bar 68 and at the beginning of bar 69 all the autographs concord as to which L.H. notes should be struck. However, only in A Chopin notated the tied notes and a slur over the bass progression. FE notated erroneously a tie and a slur starting in bar 68 which ends the line in this edition. These errors resulted in no edition presenting the correct notation. Moreover, GE1op (→GE2op→GE3op) omitted the note b category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes |
before 3rd beat in 
& mistaken slur in 
