![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The range of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 19-24
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest adding a category imprint: Editorial revisions |