Issues : GE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire Opus in GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The use of the time signature surprises only in GE1, as in FE the indication was not used in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, both in Op. 25 and in Op. 10 and the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable towards the compatible version of GC and EE. The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
GC (→GE1) features naturals before b3 and a3 in the 3rd group of semiquavers. These unnecessary signs are remnants of the erroneously repeated 2nd group of semiquavers in this place. The mistake was corrected, by changing only the elements influencing the correctness of the text – pitch of the notes, to before the 3rd note. In GE2 (→GE3) the naturals were already not included. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 6-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The dim. indication was added by Chopin in GC (→GE), most probably also in the base text to EE. Its absence in FE proves that Chopin probably omitted the base text to this edition at the time of completing the Stichvorlage manuscripts in these bars. Similarly in bar 8. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The slur of GC, contrary to FE and EE, as well as to the natural shape of the phrase – cf. bar 5 and analog. – is certainly inaccurate. Imprecise, even clearly erroneous slurs are relatively frequent in Gutmann's copies (cf., e.g., bar 9). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |