![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we include the staccato dot present in FE. The sign was added also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The long accent, present only in GC (→GE1), could have been added there by Chopin. In GE2 (→GE3) it was replaced with a standard, short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the passages including a few octaves, there are no accidentals in the sources, which, however, does not raise doubts concerning the text intended by Chopin.
In GC there are no sharps needed in the notation of f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |