![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the sign in FE is probably chargeable to the engraver of this edition. In GC this bar is only briefly marked as repetition of bar 10 and it was probably the same in the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts. Therefore, if FE has an accent in bar 10, it should be repeated also here (unless in bar 10 it was added only at the time of proofreading, which, according to us, is, however, less likely). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the 2nd half of the bar the only accidental in the part of the R.H. in GC and FE is a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 12, in GC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »