Issues : Errors of GC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The fingering versions of GC (→GE) and FE complement each other (and they generally overlap). In turn, the version of EE1 (→EE2) is most probably incomplete and erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors of GC |
||||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Based on the fact of writing the part of the L.H. under the semiquavers of the R.H., the equal quavers in GC (→GE) are a result of a mistake of the copyist who forgot to add the dot extending b and semiquaver beam. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC , Dotted or even rhythm |
||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC, FE and EE1 (→EE2) there is no returning a2. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||||
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The sign was most probably overlooked by the copyist in GC (→GE1) here. It was added in subsequent GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The version of GC (→GE1) is certainly erroneous – in this bar Chopin embraced only four semiquavers with the octave sign, differently than in similar bars, which most probably confused the copyist. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »