![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of GC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The version of GC (→GE) is almost certainly erroneous – the copyist could have copied it only from one of the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, and it is absent both in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the passages including a few octaves, there are no accidentals in the sources, which, however, does not raise doubts concerning the text intended by Chopin.
In GC there are no sharps needed in the notation of f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the fingering numeral over the 6th semiquaver in GC (→GE) is a result of a patent oversight of the copyist. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
There is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver in GC (→GE1), FE and EE. The missing category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »