mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 69

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

No fingering in GC, FE & GE2 (→GE3)

Fingering in GE1

Fingering in EE
..

GE1 and EE repeated the fingering of bar 5 here, which rather does not correspond to Chopin's intention. The editors executed the order of repeating bar 5 in this place too literally.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 69

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

..

In GE1 there are unnecessary naturals before b3 and a3, yet there is no  lowering b3 to b3. GE2 (→GE3) include the correct notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 70-72

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

dim. - - in GC

dimi-nu-en-do in EE

No indication in FE

dimin. - - - - in GE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 70

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Triad in GC (→GE) & EE

Fifth in FE
..

Lack of c1 in FE is certainly a mistake. This kind of error suggests that the engraver worked there on the basis of manuscripts and not a proof copy of the already engraved by him first page of the Etude.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 71-72

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Slur in GC (→GE1)

Slur in FE, EE & GE2 (→GE3)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources