Issues : Errors of GC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC and FE there is no lowering a to a. The mistake was corrected in GE, EE also includes the correct text. The natural was also added in FED. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
FE has an a1 as the 3rd crotchet of the middle voice in the R.H. It is almost certainly the so-called Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Lack of the middle note on the 3rd beat of the bar is almost certainly a mistake of GC (→GE1). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC (→GE1) and EE, there are no accidentals before the crotchets, so they should read as c and c2. In spite of the fact that the version does not raise any doubts as far as the sound is concerned, the omission of the naturals is proved by:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »