b. 59
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The sign added in GE2 is a result of comparison with the analogous bar 79. In turn, the sign in EE may be authentic, although also in this case a revision cannot be excluded. GE3 reintroduced the notation of the base text (if the lack of hairpins is not a print defect, resulting from the tear and wear of plates). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The extension of d1 in the 5th octave and deletion of b in the 6th quaver are the last of the changes, introduced probably in the proofreading of FE, separating an additional melodic line within the octaves. EE2 adopted the changes, yet EE3 – most probably under the influence of GE – reintroduced the b note. Similarly in bar 80. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |