Verbal indications
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire opus in GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Placing the metronome indication already at the beginning of the Etude may be a result of the routine interpretation of the engravers of FE and EE who did not see a reason to separate it from the Lento indication. Cf. the Etude in A minor, No. 11, bars 1-5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The authenticity of the ten. indications does not raise any doubts here. Chopin added them in the proofreading of FE or – which is more likely – still in the handwritten base text to this edition. The second possibility is backed by the presence of such indications in analogous bar 43 and similar bars 60-61, also in other sources – in bar 43 in GC, while in bars 60-61 in EE. Chopin could have added them subsequently in various manuscripts, however, he did not pay attention to synchronising the additions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
major, 
in both first impressions of 
present in 
.