Slurs
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 29-36
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The absence of slurs over the entire eight-bar section can be the original version, left by inaccuracy – initially, Chopin could have considered this change of notation to be a sufficient signal of the change of the theme's articulation. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The broken slur in EE is probably a result of a kind of misunderstanding at the time of interpreting the manuscript by the copyist or the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The missing slur in the L.H. in bar 70 is undoubtedly a mistake of the engraver of GE1, corrected in GE2 (→GE3), in accordance with FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 72-76
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
Lack of visible traces of corrections in the sources impedes to determine how the differences in the slurring of this four-bar section occurred. However, most probably all three ways of slurring are authentic:
In the main text, we give the slurring of the base source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |