![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
As the 9th semiquaver, FC (→GE1) features a g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
In FC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
No traces of corrections do not allow to indicate which rhythm is later, while from the stylistic point of view, both versions seem to be equal. In the main text, we give the version of the base source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The sharp before the bottom note of the chord appears only in the later sources, bearing traces of an intense editorial revision – EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). The revisers could have considered the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The moment of starting the slur in FC is unclear, which most probably corresponds to the notation of [A] and which would explain both the slur of FE and of GE (the seemingly shortened slur in GE3 is most probably a print fault). However, according to us, in this type of context, the written with panache beginning of the slur could concern only the 2nd crotchet in Chopin's intention – cf., e.g., the Mazurka in G minor, Op. 24 No. 1, bar 21. An additional argument for such an interpretation of this slur can be the slur of EE in bars 121-122. The total absence of the discussed slur in EE is most probably accidental. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |