Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give a pair of hairpins introduced probably by Chopin in FC (→GE). In EE, the sign begins earlier, while the second was overlooked (except for EE3, in which was added according to GE). In A (→FE) this detail – as majority of the dynamic indications in bars 39-53 – was not marked. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 52-54
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
It is not clear which type of accents Chopin had in mind here. Only the sign in bar 54 is clearly longer and this is how it was reproduced in FC (also the engraver of EE treated it differently than the others). As far as the omission of the remaining 5 accents in bars 52-53 is concerned, the visible in A differences in length between the 1st and 4th sign and the remaining three, although minor, can be, according to us, significant. Therefore, in the main text we suggest an interpretation including these differences. The vertical accents, used in EE in bars 52-53, are most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver – cf., e.g., the Etude in F major, No. 3, bars 29-31. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||||
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bars 49-50, the signs are most probably a Chopin addition in FC (→GE). The hairpins were added also in EE3, most probably after the comparison with GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |