



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 49-52
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
We consider Gutmann's misunderstanding of the notation of [A] to be the most probable explanation of the difference between GC (→GE) and FE and EE. The same applies to bars 53-58 and 60-64. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 53-58
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
Same as in bars 49-52, the simplest explanation of the difference in the staccato signs between GC (→GE) and FE and EE is Gutmann's misunderstanding of the notation of [A]. Similarly in bars 60-64. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 58-60
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
It is hard to state whether the dots with which six subsequent c3(4) notes in GE were provided (independently from the accents) are a result of the engraver's distraction or revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 60-64
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
Same as in bars 49-58, we attribute the difference in staccato signs between GC (→GE) and FE and EE to Gutmann's misunderstanding of the notation of [A]. Moreover, the copyist overlooked some of the dots in the L.H. in bars 62-63 (over e and B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 64-67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
Same as in the middle section of the Etude, one can see here more distinctive differences in dynamic indications. In the main text we give the version of GC (→GE):
The authenticity of the versions of the remaining sources also seems to be probable, whereby the only significant difference concerns bar 64, in which instead of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »