Issues : Errors in GE

b. 22

composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major

No marking in GC, FE, EE & GE2 (→GE3)

in GE1

..

 in GE1 is most probably an error of the engraver who confused the bars or either did not notice the error at all or forgot to delete the superfluous sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 22

composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major

..

GE1 has an erroneous instead of as the 2nd quaver in the L.H. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 58

composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major

 in GC, FE & GE2 (→GE3)

 in EE

No marking in GE1

..

The absence of  in GE1 (→GE2) is undoubtedly the engraver's oversight. In turn, placing the sign in EE only under the 4th quaver may correspond to the notation of the base text – a similar placement of the signs (corrected) can be seen in GC in bars 29 and 43.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 58-60

composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major

Accents in GC, FE & EE

Accents & dots in GE

..

It is hard to state whether the dots with which six subsequent c3(4) notes in GE were provided (independently from the accents) are a result of the engraver's distraction or revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE