Issues : EE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication according to the title page of the entire opus in GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1-14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
Nothing indicates a possible, even partial authenticity of the fingering added in EE2 (→EE3). Therefore, differently than in the Etudes, Op. 10, in which the author of the fingering was Chopin's friend, Julian Fontana, we give them in italics in a smaller font. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In AW, GC, FE and EE1 (→EE2), there is no returning b2. This characteristic for Chopin mistake was corrected in the remaining sources. In the repetition of this phrase in bar 23 the error appears only in AW, in which the repetition is not written with notes. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The version of EE1 is almost certainly erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The hairpins (and corresponding in bar 15) were probably added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE. The sign in EE3, despite being generally compatible with authentic indications of AW and FE, is undoubtedly an addition of revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |