Issues : Authentic corrections in GC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The visible in GC deletions prove that the arrangement of the sign both in FE and EE was considered to be inaccurate by Chopin. Similarly in bar 26. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The visible in GC deletion proves that, same as in bar 24, Chopin considered the arrangement of the mark in FE and EE to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
Lack of pedalling in AW and CDP suggests it having been added by Chopin at the time of developing manuscripts intended for base texts to the editions. This hypothesis is confirmed by Chopin's hand visible in an entry in GC. Similarly in bars 41-42. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »