mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Authentic corrections in GC

b. 24

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in AW & CDP

Pedalling in GC (→GE)

Pedalling in FE

Pedalling in EE
..

The visible in GC deletions prove that the arrangement of the  sign both in FE and EE was considered to be inaccurate by Chopin. Similarly in bar 26.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC

b. 26

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No pedalling in CDP

 in AW

 in GC (→GE)

 in FE & EE
..

The visible in GC deletion proves that, same as in bar 24, Chopin considered the arrangement of the  mark in FE and EE to be inaccurate.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC

b. 30

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in CDP

Pedalling in AW, GC (→GE), FE & EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC

b. 32

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in AW & CDP

Pedalling in GC (→GE), FE & EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC

b. 37-38

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

No markings in AW & CDP

Pedalling in GC (→GE), FE & EE
..

Lack of pedalling in AW and CDP suggests it having been added by Chopin at the time of developing manuscripts intended for base texts to the editions. This hypothesis is confirmed by Chopin's hand visible in an entry in GC. Similarly in bars 41-42.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC