|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In the main text, we consider the fingering digit written in FES, coming probably from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 41-48
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In CDP, there are no slurs concerning the semiquavers until the end of the Etude. We do not comment this fact in further notes concerning slurring. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CDP |
|||||||
|
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
According to us, the division of the slur in EE is most probably a result of misunderstanding Chopin's intention by the copyist or the engraver (in A, bar 42 opens a new line of the text, which contributes to inaccuracies in the notation of slurs). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Eventually, Chopin marked the emphasising of the bottom notes of the figuration, doubling the melody, indicated in AI with accents, with bigger note heads. Convergence with the accents of EE2 (→EE3), added undoubtedly by the reviser (cf. bars 40-41), is accidental. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The notation of the 4th semiquaver of each group as small or normal (big) note – see the note below, concerning the accents. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
