



b. 10
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Similarly as in analogous bars 1-2, AI has here only an accent under f2 at the beginning of bar 10. Lack of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Unclear hairpins in A , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The broken slur of EE may result from misunderstanding of the manuscript, perhaps inaccurate. In A, bar 11 closes the line; this layout, conducive to ambiguities in the slurs' notation, was probably repeated in the manuscripts which served as base texts for FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The longer hairpins in A may have concerned the renounced by Chopin (deleted in A) version where he would raise the fifth of the chord only on the 4th beat of the bar. In the main text, we give the hairpins corrected by Chopin in GE1a (→GE2). The version of GE3 is a result of a revision returning the state before the proofreading of GE1a; the version was introduced also in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The type of accent used in AI may raise doubts. We interpret it as a long accent, as the sign is clearly bigger than the short accents in bars 6 and 10. In the final version, Chopin rejected the accent, choosing a pair of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents |