Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The absence of pedalling marks in FE (→EE,GE1) is most probably an oversight of the engraver. The signs were added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4), probably on the basis of comparison with analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In bar 21, the staccato dot, present in A over the 1st octave in the L.H., was misinterpreted in FE (→GE,EE) as an additional f note, which was annexed to the sixth in the R.H. Cf. bar 125. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→EE1) lacks category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Annotations in FES , Last key signature sign |
||||||||
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE (→GE1) erroneously inserted a redundant category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
rising c
1 to c1. The obvious Chopin's imprecision was corrected in 
mark at the beginning of the bar. The mistake was corrected in the subsequent impressions of 
