Verbal indications
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
It is not certain if written in A was deliberately omitted in FE (→GE,EE). Given an identical indication appearing two bars earlier, Chopin's correction seems probable. Similarily in bar 107, see also bar 155. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3→GE4) the indication was changed in the entire Polonaise to . See the characteristics of GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3→GE4) the indication was changed in the entire Polonaise to . See the characteristics of GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 35-40
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In bars 35 and 40 GE2 (→GE3→GE4) changed to . See the characteristics of GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
It is hard to state whether the absence of in FE is a result of Chopin's proofreading or an oversight of the engraver. Therefore, in the main text we leave the inclusion of this indication at the discretion of the performer. The absence of the indication does not exclude , yet it offers a greater freedom of shaping the dynamics of this plenty of expression transition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |