Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 70-71
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Omission of the staccato dots in the L.H. in the 2nd half of bar 70 is certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE1). The first two quavers in the L.H. in bar 71 do not have dots also in A, which is probably related to the graphical layout, in which the part of the R.H. is also entirely written on the bottom stave. All these deficiencies were completed in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 74-78
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
GE2 (→GE3→GE4) and EE2 added a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 74-75
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In the 1st half of bar 75 Chopin probably considered staccato dots written under the part of the R.H. to be valid also in the left. In the 2nd half of bar 74, omission of the majority of dots in the L.H. in FE is almost certainly a mistake; the only printed dot (over c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
We adopt the staccato dots in the L.H. in bar 78 and on the first two quavers in bar 79, added in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4), to the main text due to Chopin additions of dots in the proofreading of FE in analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
next to c
2 in the R.H. A similar addition was performed in 
