Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→EE1) has no category imprint: issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 70-71
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Omission of the staccato dots in the L.H. in the 2nd half of bar 70 is certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE1). The first two quavers in the L.H. in bar 71 do not have dots also in A, which is probably related to the graphical layout, in which the part of the R.H. is also entirely written on the bottom stave. All these deficiencies were completed in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE1 includes an additional d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The lack of pedal signs in FE in bars 106-108 is certainly a mistake. The markings – pedalling and also L.H. slurs – are omitted up to the end of the page (till bar 110). All the remaining editions supplemented the pedalling with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE (→GE1) omitted the slur in the L.H. It is undoubtedly an engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. the neighbouring note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
rising g
1 to g1 on 4th L.H. quaver, like in other occurences of this bar. The obvious oversight was corrected in 
1 note in the last chord in the R.H. The mistake, probably caused by an erroneous interpretation of the demisemiquaver beam as a note, was corrected in 
in bar 106 in 
