Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 24-27
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The phrasing slur at the transition to a new line between bars 26 and 27 was erroneously broken in GE1. In GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the moment of the slur's division was moved two crotchets earlier. Although such a division of the slur is pianistically justified, it was deleted by Chopin in A (one can see a connection of the slurs in this place). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 7, in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the beginning of the slur was arbitrarily moved over the 1st note of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In analogous bar 7, in the proofreading of FE1 Chopin added a crotchet stem for g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE4 does not contain the accent for the last quaver in the L.H. Its omission could have been a totally accidental fault of print. In GE5 the sign reappeared. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1,EE) the engraver overlooked the slur for the R.H. The overlooked slur was added by the reviser of GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5), probably after the notation in analogous bar 12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in the L.H. The absence of a similar correction in bar 32 is to be considered to be Chopin's oversight. The crotchet in 
