Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 7, the absence of the staccato dot in FE may be a result of Chopin's proofreading. The presence of the dot in GE seems to be a revision (inaccuracy?) of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE4 does not contain the accent for the last quaver in the L.H. Its omission could have been a totally accidental fault of print. In GE5 the sign reappeared. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the staccato dot for the G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the last staccato dot for the bottom voice of the R.H. is undoubtedly a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, the oversight of all dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) is probably a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In A Chopin undoubtedly overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Last key signature sign |
1-G
raising g
1 to g1 in the written grupetto. He did not correct the mistake in the proofreadings of