data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The mark in AI is clearly valid from the beginning of the bar. In turn,
in FE (→GE,EE2), apart from the literal reading, can be interpreted in several ways, e.g., as
valid in this place or – which is more plausible – as
valid from the beginning of the bar. In the main text we propose the latter, being the resultant of both source notations (Cf. also analogous bar 62).
In EE3 (→EE4) an arbitrary was added to
adopted from FE (near the end of the bar), probably on the basis of comparison with bar 62.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Centrally placed marks
notation: Verbal indications