b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The exact starting point of the slur in A is unclear. In GE (→FE→EE) it was drawn from the 1st crotchet. The comparison with analogous bars 17, 21 and 29 and the general analysis of the manner of writing slurs in A leads to the conclusion that Chopin almost certainly wanted to embrace only the chords with the slur. The point where the slur ended on the 2nd crotchet of bar 26 seems less controversial, yet even that detail was reproduced inaccurately in GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 25-30
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The type of the accents over the four triplets in bars 25-26 and 29-30 is unclear in A. On the one hand, they are not much longer than some other, undoubtedly short, accents and therefore were read as short accents in GE (→FE→EE). On the other hand, they do not much differ from the long accents in analogous bars 17-18 & 21-22. In this situation we consider the uniform marking of all those places to be more likely. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A (→GE→FE) the slur embraces only bar 27. As Chopin corrected phrasing in similar contexts in bars 18-19 and 30-31, we change the text here accordingly. EE also has the version with the slur from g2 in bar 26. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The fingering that Chopin wrote here in FES, on the second occurrence of the phrase, has already been given by us upon its first occurrence in bar 19. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |