Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-67
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-32
p. 3, b. 33-50
p. 4, b. 51-67
Main text
Main text
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 58

No marks in AI & A

Dots & accent in FE (→GE,EE)

Our suggestion

All performance indications in the R.H. – dots, accents and slurs – were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the engraver, by adding a short accent to the gcrotchet, could have misinterpreted Chopin's entry in a proof copy. Therefore, in the main text we propose a long accent – cf. the note to bars 61-62.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, A, AI, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4