Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-67
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-32
p. 3, b. 33-50
p. 4, b. 51-67
Main text
Main text
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 61-62

Long accent in AI

Short accents in A (→FEGE,EE)

Long accents suggested by the editors

The accents in A seem to be short and this is how they were recreated in FE (→GE,EE). According to us, it may be a result of a subconscious tightening of the notation in order to fit the Etude on three pages. In analogous bars 29-30 the accents are clearly long and the accent in bar 61 in AI is also long.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, A, AI, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4