![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 9, b. 172-186
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
In A the 2nd part of the bar in the R.H. was deleted and rewritten next to the stave. The ties sustaining d2-a
2 are in the deleted part of the bar, while in the part which was rewritten there is only a tie sustaining a
2. As a result of this ambiguous notation, in GC (→GE) only the tie to a
2 was copied. In FE and EE the ambiguous notation of A was interpreted, according to us, correctly, preserving both ties.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Deletions in A, Inaccuracies in GC
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
A, GC, FE1, FE2, FE3, FEJ, FED, FES, EE1, GE1, GE2, GE3