Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give the legatiss. written in A (in AI this indication is absent). The change to legato in FE (→GE,EE) is probably a mistake. It is not clear whether the notation of A means that the indication is valid from the beginning of the piece or from the beginning of the two-part texture in the R.H. According to us, it is the second possibility that is more plausible. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 1-3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The slur, dividing (among others) the parts of both hands written on the bottom stave, was omitted in the editions, probably due to graphic difficulties. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The fact of shortening the hairpins in FE (→GE,EE) is certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |