![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In AI there is none of the indications written in A (→FE→EE,GE1→GE1a→GE2) in these bars, yet there is a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give most probably the only (except for AI, which is devoid of indications) authentic version of articulation signs – four staccato dots written in A, traditionally meaning small accents. The remaining versions are probably a result of imposition of errors and revisions of the editors. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
It is unclear whether Chopin wanted to mark the staccato of the quaver after the semiquaver triplet with a dot, as it is in A, or with a wedge, as it is in AI (only in bar 58) and FE (→GE,EE; in EE2 both signs were omitted, while in GE3 in bar 58 there is a dot). In this case, we consider A as the most reliable source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |