Issues : fz – f
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The way in which the indication is written in A makes a misinterpretation highly likely. Due to this fact, in the main text we give preference to this version. Apart of the change of to in FE (→GE,EE), the ten. indication for the chord in the L.H. was omitted (the indication for the R.H. was reproduced in accordance with A), which reinforces the conviction about the engraver's inattention. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give written in A. As in many different cases (see e.g. the Etude in C minor, No. 4, bar 1), in FE (→GE) is almost certainly a result of misunderstanding of the manuscript by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |